Temperament[ edit ] Both the lion and the tiger have fearsome reputations in their native areas in relation to prey, sympatric predators, and people. Both may prey on humansthough rates of man-eating tend to be higher for the tiger.
The lion is usually a highly social animal while the tiger is solitary. It is agreed that the tiger is faster, smarter and more ferocious, and that keepers of captive tigers must constantly fear sudden attack.
The majority of single roaming lions tend to be males preparing for maturation and assimilation with a new or existing pride. While male lions are generally larger and stronger than female lions, it is the close-knit female pride alliance that typically hunts and provides for the pride.
|Bring Out your beast||This question originally appeared on Quora.|
|Lion and Tiger Pride||This is like putting a heavy inexperienced amateur fighter in ring with a taller, leaner professional with a mean history of fights under his belt. Non blockquoted text is original.|
|Lions are the king of the plains. Tigers rule the jungle. But face to face, which would win?||Their appearance is the most obvious difference between a lion and a tiger. Tigers have bold, black stripes across their bodies, whereas lions do not have any stripes.|
|Physical comparison of tigers and lions - Wikipedia||Temperament[ edit ] Both the lion and the tiger have fearsome reputations in their native areas in relation to prey, sympatric predators, and people. Both may prey on humansthough rates of man-eating tend to be higher for the tiger.|
|Though Brakefield agreed with Guinness   on the weight of the Transvaal lion, they did not agree about the Angolan lion being this long,  and according to Peter Hathaway Capstickthe length between the pegs was not independently verifiable. Note that the body is taller at the front, before the head, than at the back, and that the physique of the Okavango lion is related to its lifestyle, which involves walking though water quite often.|
By contrast, tigers are often solitary,  though they do socialize. For example, Asiatic lions are social like their Lions vs tigers relatives, and females may be promiscuous.
Lion-baiting and Tiger-baiting A Mughal painting of a Dervish with a lion and tiger In the circuses of Ancient Romeexotic beasts were commonly pitted against each other,  including Barbary lions    and tigers.
Although lions and tigers can be kept together in harmony in captivity,  fatal conflicts have also been recorded. The lion is also of cultural importance in the Far East  including the land   of the Indochinese tiger but according to authors such as Reginald Innes Pocock  and Nowell and Jackson the lion did not naturally occur there.
According to Colin Tudgegiven that both cats hunt large herbivoresit is likely that they had been in competition in Asia. Despite their social nature, lions might have competed with tigers on an individual basis, as they would with each other.
In a one-on-one encounter, it is believed that a Bengal tiger could beat an Indian lion, given its weight advantage. Therefore it would appear that in order for Asiatic lions to survive in an area with Bengal tigers, the lions would have to be translocated there as intact groups rather than as individuals.
According to him, there was evidence that tigers inhabited the Subcontinent, before lions. The tigers likely entered Northern India from the eastern end of the Himalayasthrough Burmaand started spreading throughout the area, before the lions likely entered Northern India from Balochistan or Persiaand spread to places like the Bengal and the Nerbudda River.
Because of that, before the presence of man could limit the spread of lions, tigers reached parts of India that lions did not reach.
This photograph was taken by Antoin Sevruguinca. The zver sprang towards his thighs, and hurt him and his horse. Traditionally, the zver was considered to be a wolf or lynxbut, according to Heptner and Sludskiineither would spring at a rider or injure a horse, so it was more likely to be a big cat, with some people thinking that it could have been a leopardor that it was more likely to be a tiger than a lion.
The occurrence of the lion at the southern Russian Steppes, or the area of the mouth of the Don Riveris disputed, whereas tigers likely occurred in the Russian Steppes or at the estuary of the Don River. Intrusions from the Soviet Union were reported in the s. Many years ago, in the north, lions had been in the area of Tehranand the Persian upland.
Around the yearthey were encountered in the south, although not frequently. However, in the s, they occurred in western region, in the southwestern part of the Zagros Mountainsnear Mesopotamiaand in forested areas which were south and southeast of Shiraz.
Persian tigers also occurred in regions close to the Soviet Union, including the north-western region, enough for them to invade the Trans-Caucasus and Turkestan, including those of the Atrek Basin and Gorgan.
In the s, lions also occurred in the upper courses of the Tigris, near Mosul in the north. In the s, there were many lions in reed marshesalong the banks of the two rives, though mostly in their lower reaches Blanford, Ina tiger was killed near Mosul Kock, In particular, lions had been present in the area of Aleppoeven as late as Kinnear Before that, the lion had been throughout Asia Minorexcepting the region of the Pontic Mountains in the north.
Meyer, in his book, The Antiquity of the Lion in Greece, said that the lion did indeed occur in the region of Khaurismbetween Afghanistan and the Caspian Sea. Petersburghwhich said that the predators of Khaurism included both the lion and tiger.
They also occurred in the regions of the Amu and Syr Daryasand others, in a vast area extending to the region of Western Siberia or Lake Baikal in the east, where the Amur tiger also reportedly occurred. Two tigers that were captured in southwestern Tajikistan harbored tapeworms Taenia bubesei which were also recovered from the lion, according to Chernyshev Judging from cave paintingssuch as those of Chauvetcave lions were social, having formed hunting groups like their modern relatives.
Their great distribution may have enabled them to influence the distributions of sympatric carnivores like the tiger, through direct or indirect competition.
In fact, during the early Pleistocene, tigers, including the prehistoric Wanhsien tiger  appear to have been confined to the Far East, from Siberia in the north to the Sunda Islands in the south.
It was during the late Pleistocene or Holocenearound when the cave lion became rare or extinct,   that the tiger spread westwards to places like the Caucasus and Indian Subcontinent.
It was not always clear which species regularly beat the other, according to Doctor Packer Get the latest Detroit Lions news, scores, stats, standings, rumors, and more from ESPN.
Lions are the king of the plains. Tigers rule the jungle. But face to face, which would win?. Well, let’s talk size first. Tigers are heavier, weighing up to pounds to the lion’s May 29, · Asiatic lions (smaller than African lions) and tigers both occur in India.
Although their ranges no longer overlap, they did once and therefore this was a very real scenario a long time ago. Lions and tigers are among the most ferocious animals but there are important differences between them.
They are both among the five big cats (the other three being the jaguar, leopard, and snow leopard) and are apex predators — i.e., they have no predators of their own and reside at the top of.
several lions - ” Soon I had a free-for-all in the arena involving every one of my lions and two tigers (one was a tigress who was fighting several lions and managed to badly rip the shoulder of a lion)” (Page 68, Ref. 27) from his book ‘Facing the Big Cats’. Asiatic lions (smaller than African lions) and tigers both occur in India.
Although their ranges no longer overlap, they did once and therefore .