From the information you have provided, I am guessing you are trying to write a thesis statement about the ending of the story. From this ending, we learn that Zaroff was not expecting Rainsford to come in and kill him.
Conclusion Thematic Development in "Young Goodman Brown" and "The Most Dangerous Game" The conflict between good and evil is one that appears throughout literature and it plays a significant role in two seemingly divergent short stories: Furthermore, in both stories the encounters with evil change the protagonists.
While the conflict between good and evil may be the overriding theme in both stories, they each have a number of lesser themes that the authors use to help demonstrate the protagonists' struggles with evil.
In "Young Goodman Brown," Hawthorne uses the idea of community and social interactions to frame the story. Not only is Brown aware of his role in the community, but also very cognizant of how his friends and neighbors impact the community.
Hawthorne also uses the past and nostalgia as a theme, showing Goodman Brown remembering various community members in different capacities and reflecting on how he is the same or different from those who came before him.
However, one of Hawthorne's most effective themes is the way he uses the nature of reality. Ultimately, the reader, like Goodman Brown, is left wondering whether or not Brown actually saw those things in the wood or whether they were in his imagination.
Whether or not they were real, Brown allows those visions to shape and change how he views the people around him, which impacts how he views himself. In the battle between good and evil, the real evil that Brown confronts is the evil in his own soul, and he is unable to defeat it.
Given that Connell chooses not to allow the presence of evil to corrupt his protagonist, it should come as no surprise that he uses different themes to explore the conflict between good and evil in "The Most Dangerous Game. In fact, at the beginning of the story Rainsford tells Whitney, "The world is made up of two classes -- the hunters and the huntees.
Luckily, you and I are hunters" Connell, Connell also employs the idea of violence as a theme. Both Rainsford and General Zaroff are violent men, but their violence has a different context, leaving the reader to ponder whether violence should be equated with evil.
Fear is another important theme in the story; Rainsford learns what is to feel the fear of death and pain that Whitney described at the beginning of the story and this fear motivates him, not only to escape Zaroff's plans to kill him, but also to kill Zaroff.
To defeat Zaroff, Rainsford also has to battle with nature, first surviving the swim to the island and then using the island against Zaroff. In fact, the conflict between Zaroff and Rainsford is not an internal conflict ; it is the battle of skill between two men and Rainsford emerges triumphant.
As the different themes make clear, while the protagonists of both stories fight against something that can be seen as evil, it impacts them in different ways. At the beginning of the stories, Goodman Brown seems like a much better and kinder man than Sanger Rainsford.
Brown kisses his wife goodbye and seems to be a nice man with a nice life. In contrast, Rainsford is not only en route to a trophy hunting destination, but genuinely does not care if the animals he hunts experience fear or pain.
Both men confront evil, but in different formats.
Rainsford defeats Zaroff and gains empathy for the animals he once hunted during the experience. In contrast, while Brown seems to defeat the Devil's tempting offers by turning to God, he emerges from the experience embittered, angry, and suspicious after his confrontation with evil.
What is interesting is that the authors create very different atmospheres to frame the conflict between good and evil. In "Young Goodman Brown," Hawthorne conveys the themes by first establishing the importance of community and then revealing the internal flaws of Brown's companions.
Though they are said to do horrible things, including infant sacrifice, at no point in the story does it ever appear that Brown is actually in any physical danger from the people he encounters in the forest. Instead, the danger is in his mind. In contrast, Rainsford spends almost all of his story in actual peril.
He is in danger from the moment he falls off of the boat until the moment that he kills Zaroff, though he is unaware of the danger for a brief period after being rescued.
Connell uses isolation to help highlight the conflict between Rainsford and Zaroff. Moreover, he focuses on the similarities between the two great hunters to make Rainsford recognize some of the less appealing parts of his own personality. Finally, Connell uses actual fear of imminent physical harm, pain, and death to create empathy in Rainsford, making the struggle an external one, not simply an internal one.
However, Rainsford uses internal skills and the ability to be both predator and prey to defeat Zaroff. Although the authors both examine the nature of the conflict of good and evil, they appear to have different purposes.
Hawthorne really questions what it means to be pious.
The devil in his story says, "Evil is the nature of mankind. Evil must be your only happiness. Welcome again, my children, to the communion of your race," and Hawthorne certainly seems to suggest that, by not embracing evil, Brown chose to be unhappy Hawthorne, Connell appears to have a different purpose, and argues against a black and white interpretation of the human condition, suggesting, instead, that humans alternately play roles as predator and prey, which establishes empathy, not only for the hunted, but also for the hunter.Thesis Statement: Through scenery and characterization in “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the violence in human nature is put to the test with what is right and what has become tradition.
The Destructors By: John P. Calloway Thesis Statement: Upon reading the two stories, “The Destructors and the Most Dangerous Game” you will find the settings for the two stories are that of two different times, places, and world views.
"The Most Dangerous Game", also published as "The Hounds of Zaroff" , is a short story by Richard Connell, first published in Collier's on January 19, The Most Dangerous Game is written by Richard Connell, it is about two experienced hunters who hunt one another to one’s death.
In the film, High Noon, and the book, The Most Dangerous Game, both have they’re differences between their settings and conflicts, but they also have similarities between their two main characters. Despite Rainsford’s first impressions, the character General Zaroff from the short story by Richard Connell “The Most Dangerous Game” is not a civilized man.
Thesis. Most dangerous game short story essay The Most Dangerous Game study guide contains a biography of Richard Connell, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
General Zaroff, one of the main characters in The Most Dangerous Game, was introduced to readers towards the middle of the book and is the antagonist.